command and conquer 3 game play 2

It may have come out in 2010 dude, but at least I would feel confindent that im buying a quality game and will have full support for it, also it would have been twice as better. Westwood makes their games almost perfect, when EA released this game it had so many bugs it needed 2 or 3 patches in 1 week. Game was rushed to get out.

You should better be HAPPY of that EA fix bugs so fast instead of if they didnt! Yes maybe there are bugs, but ea have already released many patches and improved gameplay and fixed most bugs.

EA ans Westwood are the same company

"Ea have done for CnC what westwoods could never have afforded to do. CnC 3 looks amazing compared to previous CnC games, you cant see from just a trailer like this, but, the amount of innovation on the code sidethings, (not just graphics) it would have took westwood til 2010 to get to the stage ea are at now."

No it just need 2.0 GHz or faster CPU, 512MB of RAM or greater, 6.0 GB or more free space, direct 9.0c,video ATI Redeon 8500(9500 for Vusta) or greater; Nvidia GeForce4(6100 for Vista) or greater Note:ATI Radeon 9200,9250 PCI;nvidia GeForce 4 MX are not supported

does this need high system requirments???

Generals sucked...this one is way better.

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOA Buddy... Shut it... Generals was one of the best FOR its time.. YOU CANT compare them at all.. CNC3 is a remake of tiberiun sun and red alert and all those , cnc generals was one of the 1st of that type for EA that actually didnt suck that bad (when i say remake i mean almost same consept). I like both of the games 4.5 for both

hm, sound weird there, but lets see in demo :p

stop talk bs, if you never played CC who cares what the fuck you talk about ;) this game gonnarock