the gtr....what a machine.a real bench mark!!!
|
I guess you are right about the turbos. but i am sure you could take alot of weight out of the car as the road legal z-tune of this car loses quite a bit. so a track version could lose more and maybe have the power bumped a bit.
either way i am among the hordes of youtubers that can only afford to finance and E36 m3 at the moment and can only dream of one of these cars while i waste time at work.
|
no it will not,they did it in the past and they will do it again.
|
lol i didnt read your comment right, i thought you were saying the GT3 could be better if they put bigger turbs on it, to which i said what i said... sorry. youre right, although i think theyve maximised responsiveness and got the boost turned up past the stanrd 6-8 psi anyway... so i really highly doubt youd see an overall better car by putting on bigger turbs... maybe on the strip yes, but around a track it would lack responsiveness and waiting to spool up.
|
a GT3 has no turbo charger... it is a naturally aspirated 3.8 litre flat 6 hanging out over the rear axle.
|
nissan owns!
|
sure
|
tho i would rather have the gt3, the gtr lacks the rear engine handicapp and could be lightened and make more power with bigger turbos. hands down winner
|
it weigh's almost 2 tons
|
M3 is not in the same class as the other two. I wish the GT-R sounded less like a vacuum cleaner, but that's its only fault.
|