no way, i own a s2000 and its better hahaha,
to me it is, but eh, integras are pretty sick
|
14.427 s2000 must be stock, cuz stock they can do high 13.9s to low 14s so must have been a crapy run
|
thats sad the s2 was sitting at the line hella long too..couldve had a good launch
|
yeah the launch is what gets ya! in one day i got my launch down pat.
First run-2.5 60ft :( ran a 14.8!!
Second run- 2.3 60ft (eh) ran a 14.2
Third run- 2.0 60ft - 13.99
Forth run- 1.9 60ft - 13.81
The launch is where the S2k makes its time! Oh and my S isnt stock :)
|
Even the handling characteristics of the vehicle don't truly justify the price. My s2000 had a near perfect 50/50 weight distribution just as the NSX does. My s2000 also has double wishbone suspension, just as the NSX does. Sure, I can admit that ANY year NSX can still out handle my car, I don't believe handling characteristics justify a $20-40,000 dollar price difference (depending on year). This just my opinion.
|
Yes you can look at it that way but the NSX has 300% more potential than the s2000 when it comes to motorsports. the NSX is proven to outlast the s2000 just by life alone in a normal enviroment.
|
and how much do they cost???
hahaha thats what i thot
|
the NSX competes with Vipers/Corvettes/Ferarris etc.
Yes the price is higher but you get quality next to NONE. That all the insurance I need to buy the SUpercar that outhandles every car in its class.
THe NSX is a all Aluminuim unibody frame too.
ON PAPER.... LITTLE DIFFERENT BUT IN REALITY A WHOLE ANPOTHER WORLD.
dont look at the car on "paper'. big mistake
|
stock i wouldn't really say the NSX "competes" with vipers/corvettes/ferraris. sure its a lightweight MR, but still
|
That was okay, they are hondas. Whaddaya expect? jk but seriously maybe it was really hot don't give em so much crap
|