I have Quake 2 on PSX.
The playstation version is way smoother because of the analog on the dual shock controller makes looking around feel so smooth and responsive.
The N64 controllers analogy stick sucks, gives jerky movements, and makes your thumb dam sore after an hour of play.
BUT BUT BUT
on the PSX... the PAL version is FAR inferior to the NTSC version. The PAL is slower, and runs with ugly black boarders on the top and bottom of screen. But the NTSC is smooth and fullscreen.
|
is the psone version really that slow
|
PErhaps he's playing this on an emulator.
|
PC version is the best, but the ps1 version has a few advantages over it. The N64 version looked realy poor, mainly because it didnt have CD's and didn't have much space.
Oh, and why didn't the ps1 version have any soundtrack?
|
N64 looks good but lacks the shadow and detail the pc and psx version had, psx had pixelated textures and lower frame rate. But you can't go wrong with any version. I own all consoles and will get the n64 version just cuz... lol.
|
I don't think the point is to bash any version... The point is just to show how they looked. PC Quakle II Arena was an amazing game, was the first open gl game, the lightning and explosions were amazing. i remember watching a review on tv and he couldn't even give it a 10 because at the time it was above anything ever made.
|
Wow, the PS1 version runs SOOOOO slow coming from the standpoint of someone who has only played the N64 and PC versions. The Playstation 1 obviously took beauty more seriously than it did framerate, because it takes over a second just to pump the normal shotgun.
|
thats becuz hes runnin it on an emulator
watch "Quake II PSX (Part 1 of 15)"
|
WTF! Are you an idiot sonyfanboy?
|
ISNT IT OVBIOUS!!!
ok maybe a little
but you have to admit it, playstations r better, except the 3
|