Search Videos

Laser TV predicted to be death of Plasma TV



Video Title : Laser TV predicted to be death of Plasma TV
Description : Necsel technology could enable home theater systems that marry over 200% of NTSC color coverage, high-brightness,high contrast, high-resolution images, less than 8" depth, a thin, wide viewing angle architecture, and low power consumption (200 W for a 65" screen) at an affordable cost. http://www.necsel.com http://www.arasor.net http://www.novalux.com/assets/downloads/Novalux%20IDW%20LAD2-2%20PDF.pdf http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20071115/pdf/315vj2bp37t7l9.pdf
Views : 54886
Rating : 4.85
Keywords, Tags : Laser tv DLP plasma necsel television display rear projection oled dlp led fed amoled flexible mitsubishi canon epson
Video Length : 0 : 53


Comments :

Hm, you seem to be forgetting that the only difference you can see is the contrast.

True. And LCD also has a decade+ head start so it`s not fair to compare them yet. Still; i`m somewhat more interested in OLED because of it`s energy efficiency and because it`s incredibly thin. It also has a contrast ratio of 1,000,000:1. But the future is most likely e-ink. This paper screen is very interesting. Flexible and Extremely energy efficient. Yet it`s a great job from the Australians for developing this technology into a regular TV screen. I will certainly follow it`s progress.

Yeah OLED seems to be the way with us destroying the planet and what not.

the only thing about OLED tv that bothers me is that it only has a shelf life of four years since its organic. So the question is who is going to buy a tv every four years? Its utterly stupid now adays that people by a 1500 dollar tv ever five years now when back in the day you bought a tv and it lasted for 30 years. I'm not impressed and just because a tv is thinner i'm more interested in longevity and good picture. I have better things to do with my money then buying tv's every 4 years.

Well Sonys claims a lifespan of 30,000 hours for it`s first screens. A research company claims their test of the Sony oled Tv shows it might only last 17.000 hours. But considering i watch TV about 2 hours each day i could still use it for about 8500 days or 23 years my self. But i agree it`s a great marketing trick. Just sell them one TV and a few years later they might need another. That`s certainly a good business model. But not a very moral one if you ask me.

Yeah great marketing trick to those who don't think before they buy. Non laswer LED's do not produce a single frequency and are a mostley incoherent light source. They typically have a bandwidth of at least a few nanometers. But in the new laser tv's coming out a diode laser is different in that it puts the gain material the LED inside a laswer cavity to produce a coherent output through the effect of stimulated emission.

Cool. And e-ink might be even more interesting in a few years time considering it uses the least energy of all options. Because of it`s flexibility it also opens up a whole new world. And it`s also extremely long lasting. Just take a look; om/watch?v=Wgh6CM6D-hY

An also a unpulsed diode or otherwise laswer usually has much less bandwidth and is therefore more spectrally pure. It would also be much much brighter then an incoherent LED too. Sorry i misspelled laser like twice in my last post. Must be the excitement of that new laser tv coming out in 2009.(lol)

Absolutely NO reason to show it. Not like you can see it's quality.

channel 10 :D


Powered By IT Middle 2006©Viduz.com All Rights Reserved. All Video materials brought by YouTube.com